← Retour au hub|GreenPrecheck
GreenPrecheckTexte de l'allégation écologique vs facteurs publiés des Guides verts pour marketers et équipes produit
S'abonner

Texte de l'allégation écologique vs facteurs publiés des Guides verts pour marketers et équipes produit

Methodology: Green Guides patterns · claim qualifiers · human review

Paste your environmental or sustainability marketing claim before it ships. Get a scored pre-check report — is it an unqualified umbrella term like “eco-friendly”, does a specific claim (recyclable, compostable, recycled content, carbon neutral) carry the qualifier the guides require, is the wording absolute or overbroad, and is a certification named and scoped — based on the FTC Green Guides (16 CFR Part 260). A heads-up, not a legal opinion.

1. What the engine owns

Severity-ranked findings from pasted environmental-claim wording against heuristics derived from the FTC Green Guides (16 CFR Part 260 — general environmental benefit claims, recyclable / recycled content / compostable / degradable / free-of / non-toxic / renewable energy and materials / carbon offsets, and certifications). Check families: vague / unqualified umbrella terms (“eco-friendly”, “sustainable”, “green” with no specific attribute); absolute or zero-impact wording (“100% green”, “zero waste”); carbon / climate claims that need method disclosure; recyclable / compostable / recycled-content claims that lack the qualifier their section expects; and evidence / certification advisories (unnamed seals, net-zero theatre) that never invent lab results. Scores dock per HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW finding (advisories never dock); the rule snapshot is dated by the engine version — it is not synced with regulator pages in real time. Demo is labelled Rule-based — never silent mock.

2. What optional AI may do

Explain or polish findings when a key is configured. Upstream failure returns 502. No invented findings, no quotes from copy you did not paste, no life-cycle or certification lookup the engine did not run.

3. What you must do

  • Review findings against your own product data, lab reports and certifications — only you know whether a recycled %, compostability claim or offset is substantiable.
  • Apply fixes in your own packaging, ads and pages — GreenPrecheck never publishes or connects to retailer portals.
  • Treat output as decision-support, not a green-claims certification or legal advice.

4. What we deliberately do not do

  • Life-cycle assessment, lab testing, facility-access lookup, offset-registry or certification verification — those facts live outside the pasted text.
  • Continuous monitoring of live product pages or automated publishing.
  • Compliance probabilities or enforcement-prediction numbers — outside the regulator nobody can compute what it will decide.
  • Legal review — Part 260 checks read claim wording patterns, not your full obligations. Non-US regimes (e.g. EU Green Claims Directive / EmpCo themes) appear as labeled advisories only; regulated campaigns need a qualified professional.

Heuristic pre-check — not a green-claims certification or legal advice. No LCA, lab test, certification lookup or enforcement prediction performed.

Ouvrir le studio

Ce résultat vous a-t-il été utile ?Commentaires